|
Forwarded this? Subscribe
here and get it every Tuesday.
|
The Brave New Business Journal
Issue 17 · Tuesday 25 August 2026 · from Anne Becheru
|
|
Hello,
A French frigate called the Belle Poule was searching for a ship lost in a storm.
In broad daylight the lookout signalled a wreck. Every person on board, officers
and sailors, saw a raft covered with men waving for help.
The admiral lowered a rescue boat. Getting closer, the men in it saw arms
stretching out and heard voices.
They arrived to find a few tree branches floating in the water.
Nobody lied. A crew already looking for survivors got one suggestion from one
person, and several hundred trained sailors then saw, in detail, something that
was not there.
I spent ten years in journalism and media, and the years since working with
companies and investors across Europe, the Gulf and North America. What I learned
was not how to find information faster. It was which questions to ask in the
first hour, before the thing has finished working on me.
Most of those questions are not about whether the story is true. They are about
who wanted it published.
|
|
Featured
This is a board-level problem, not a fringe one
Pew Research Center asked adults in 25 countries whether false information online
is a major threat to their country. A median of 72 per cent said yes, and
majorities said so in 24 of the 25.
In the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report 2026, misinformation and
disinformation ranked second among short-term global risks, behind only
geoeconomic confrontation.
|
|
Graph 1 · What people already think
A median of 72% call false information online a major threat
|
72%
Median across 25 countries. Majorities said the same in 24 of the 25.
|
Source: Pew Research Center, International Opinion on Global Threats, 19 August
2025. Median of 25 countries surveyed.
|
|
Why it outruns you
False travels faster than true. MIT researchers studied about 126,000 stories
shared on Twitter over eleven years, classified by six independent fact-checking
organisations that agreed with each other 95 to 98 per cent of the time. False
stories were 70 per cent more likely to be shared onward, and true stories took
roughly six times as long to reach 1,500 people. That is not a story about stupid
people. It is about which things feel worth passing on.
Repetition feels like evidence.
|
“At the end of a certain time we have forgotten who is the author of the
repeated assertion, and we finish by believing it.”
Gustave Le Bon, 1895
|
What is new since Le Bon is that repetition can be manufactured. The feeling that
everyone is saying something is now a thing you can buy.
And nobody is coming to correct it
X’s Community Notes is the most visible correction system in the world. A
four-year study of X’s full public notes dataset, covering 2021 to 2025, found
that only 8.3 per cent were ever rated helpful and shown. 87.7 per cent stayed in
“needs more ratings” and never appeared at all.
The ones that do appear take an average of 26 hours. Almost all the sharing has
happened by then. Twenty-six hours later is not a correction, it is an epitaph.
Meta went the same way. It announced the end of its third-party fact-checking
programme on 7 January 2025, and from 7 April 2025 stopped applying fact-check
labels in the United States.
In the hour that matters, you are the fact-check.
|
|
Graph 2 · The correction almost never arrives
What happens to a Community Note on X
|
|
Rated helpful and shown
|
8.3%
|
|
|
Rated not helpful
|
~4%
|
|
|
Stuck in “needs more ratings”, never shown
|
87.7%
|
And the ones that do appear take an average of 26 hours. Almost all the sharing
has already happened by then.
Source: From Birdwatch to Community Notes, a four-year analysis of X's public
Community Notes dataset, January 2021 to January 2025 (arXiv:2510.09585). The
not-helpful share is the remainder, 100 minus 8.3 minus 87.7.
|
|
The ten questions
Three about you, before you look at the story
|
1
|
What did I feel, and did I feel it before
I finished reading? A reaction that arrives at the headline is a
reaction to the headline, not to the news. You are not disqualified from
having it. You should not act on it yet.
|
|
2
|
Do I want this to be true? The
most dangerous story is the one confirming what you already believe about a
competitor, a market or a colleague. It is the one you will check least and
repeat most.
|
|
3
|
What am I about to do that I would not do
in an hour? Forward, reply, call someone, move a price. If the
answer is nothing, carry on. It is rarely nothing.
|
Three about the claim
|
4
|
What actually happened, in one sentence
with no adjectives? A plant closed. A rate moved. A contract went
elsewhere. The event is almost always smaller than the headline, and
writing it plainly shows you the gap.
|
|
5
|
Who actually saw it happen, and how many
sources is this really? Not who reported it. Who was in the room,
or which document exists. Ten outlets citing one wire is one source.
|
|
6
|
What is the denominator? Up three
hundred per cent from what, to what, over what period, measured how. A
percentage with no base is not data, it is a shape.
|
Four about who is behind it
This is the part most people skip, and it is the part that matters.
|
7
|
Who ordered this, and why this
week? Somebody decided you should read this now. A press office,
an investor, a competitor, a ministry, a fund with a position. Company news
rarely surfaces by accident and the timing is almost never neutral. If you
cannot see a reason it appeared today rather than last month, you have not
found the reason yet.
|
|
8
|
Follow the money. Who pays the outlet, and
who pays the source? Who owns the publication, who advertises in
it, who funded the study, who employs the analyst being quoted. None of it
makes the story false. All of it tells you what was selected and what was
left out.
|
|
9
|
Who gains if I believe it, and who gains
if I act on it? Two different lists. The second is shorter and
more revealing. Somebody is on it.
|
|
10
|
What position am I being handed, and what
would I have concluded on my own from the same facts? Every story
arrives with a conclusion attached, and the conclusion is free, which
should make you suspicious of the price. If you land somewhere else, that
difference is the whole story.
|
|
Never take a pushed position without doing the asking first. That is the
entire discipline. Everything above is just how you do the asking.
|
|
|
If this was useful, pass it on
There is nothing to buy in this email. One favour instead.
Send it to a colleague, to your boss, or to the person in your company who
forwards things fastest. That last one with affection.
If someone forwarded this to you,
subscribe here. One email, Tuesday mornings.
Who we are, since you might be wondering
Brave New Media is a boutique B2B media and marketing agency. Small team, we work
globally.
We have only just started talking about ourselves in public, so it is fair if you
are surprised to be getting email from a company with almost no footprint. We
spent years doing the work and close to no time telling anyone about it. That was
a choice, and on reflection it was the wrong one.
It is changing quickly now, and on purpose.
Glad you are here for it.
If you want to reply, it comes straight to me and I read every one.
See you next Tuesday.
|
Anne, Senior Marketing Strategist,
Founder of Brave New Media
The Brave New Business Journal · Issue 17
|
|
Visit brave-new.com to see who we
are, how we work, and what we refuse to do.
|
|