|
A Note Before the Issue
|
|
What Tuesdays look like from now on.
|
|
Every Tuesday morning at 07:15 your time, The Brave New Business
Journalwill land in this inbox. Six minutes. Four sections.
|
|
One macro signal translated into a marketing decision. One AI & search shift
scored for 90-day impact. Five LinkedIn post templates the founder’s chair can
actually use this week. One operator’s question answered.
|
|
So you know what you signed up for, the most recent issue is pasted in full below,
not as a link.
|
|
— Anne
|
|
|
|
The Brave New Business Journal
|
|
Issue 01 · Tuesday, 5 May 2026 · Reading time: 6 minutes
|
|
This week’s question for logistics, supply chain, and commercial leaders: when oil
is at $105, the Strait of Hormuz is half-closed, UPS just dropped 10% in a single
session, and your customers’ inboxes are flooded with “thoughts on the situation,”
what do you actually say, and how do you say it so it builds the brand instead of
burning it?
|
|
01 · Macro Signal → Marketing Decision
|
|
Procurement just stopped buying “efficient.”
|
|
The
signal.Yesterday, UPS dropped 9.98%, FedEx dropped 9.10%, C.H. Robinson
dropped 8.94% on news that Amazon expanded its third-party logistics network. Same
day, Brent crossed $105 on the UAE intercepting Iranian cruise missiles. Two
stories. One read-through for anyone selling into a supply chain buyer right now:
the cost of being a single-mode, single-route, single-vendor operator just got
priced into the equity.
|
|
What this means for your
positioning.If your value proposition still leads with “efficient,”
“optimised,” or “lowest cost per shipment,” you are pitching into a market that has
stopped buying that story. Procurement scorecards are quietly being rewritten. The
new top-of-funnel question your buyers are asking themselves is not who is
cheapest?It is who absorbs volatility for me?
|
|
The marketing decision
this week.Audit your homepage hero, your sales deck slide 2, and the
first paragraph of your top three case studies. Count how many times
“efficient” or “optimised” appears versus “resilient,” “redundant,” “modal
flexibility,” or “scenario-tested.” If the ratio is wrong, change it before
Friday.
|
|
|
A note of
caution.Resilience is the easiest claim in the world to make and the
hardest to substantiate. April Dunford’s positioning test still holds: if your
competitor can claim the same word with a straight face, the word is not your
positioning. It is wallpaper. Lead with resilience only if the next click delivers
a measurable, dated, named proof point. For the operational case, Yossi Sheffi at
MIT CTL has been writing the most useful work on building real resilience versus
performing it.
|
|
|
|
02 · AI & Search Shift
|
|
|
|
Procurement agents are reading your site before your sales team gets a meeting.
|
|
The shift.Sierra
(Bret Taylor’s agentic customer service company) raised nearly $1B last week, its
second nine-figure round in months. The headline is the valuation. The actual
signal is that procurement teams are now buying agentic systems that interrogate
vendor websites directly during shortlisting. They no longer wait for a sales rep
to send a deck. The agent reads your site, your FAQ, your case studies, your blog,
and writes the shortlist memo before a human has touched it.
|
|
Why it matters in the next 90
days.If your B2B service pages are written for a human scanner with long
hero sections, brand poetry above the fold, and the actual offer buried at
line 200, you are now invisible to a class of buyers you did not previously have to
think about. Agents extract structured answers. Brand poetry returns nothing.
|
|
What to do this week, not next quarter.
|
|
1.
|
Pick your three highest-revenue service pages.
|
|
2.
|
Add a clean, structured “What we do / Who it is for / What it costs / What
changes for the buyer” block at the very top.
|
|
3.
|
Write one FAQ answer in fewer than 60 words for each of the five questions a
procurement agent would actually ask. Not the questions your CMO wants to be
asked.
|
|
4.
|
Add the explicit phrases your buyers’ agents are searching for — things like
“supply chain resilience,” “scenario-planned lead times,” your modes, your
geographies — in plain text, not image overlays.
|
|
|
This is unglamorous work. It also moves the needle inside one quarter, which is
more than most quarterly campaigns can claim.
|
|
|
|
03 · Five LinkedIn Templates
|
|
For logistics leaders writing about a major supply chain event.
|
|
The dominant move on LinkedIn this week is going to be the hot take on Iran, oil,
or Hormuz, written by people who are not geopolitical analysts. The reader’s eye
glides over it. It does nothing for your brand and less for your pipeline.
|
|
These five templates do something different. Each one is rooted in a specific
persuasion or positioning mechanic (Cialdini, Dunford, Hormozi) and each one serves
a defined marketing function: category creation, demand generation, trust building,
defection prevention, or competitor displacement. Pick the one whose marketing job you actually need this
week. Do not post all five.
|
|
Template 1
The Insider Reframe
Marketing function: category creation. Mechanic: authority plus
contrarian framing (Cialdini).
|
|
Hook
formula:“Everyone is talking about [dominant news narrative]. From
inside [your function], the more important number is [counter-data point].”
|
Body (5 to 7
lines):
- Name the consensus reading of the event in
one sentence.
- Reveal the operational metric that actually
moves your decisions (transit days variance, single-source exposure %,
demurrage cost per container).
- Explain why the consensus number is a
lagging indicator and yours is leading.
- One concrete decision you made or are making this week because of your
number.
|
|
Closing
line:“What is the number you are actually watching this week, not
the one in the headlines?”
|
|
Example opening:“Everyone is
talking about Brent at $105. From inside our network, the more important
number is 14M bpd. That is the throughput threshold below which our
Asia-to-Europe lanes flip from healthy to triage.”
|
|
|
Template 2
The Cost of Silence
Marketing function: trust building plus defection prevention. Mechanic:
loss aversion (Cialdini) plus specific dollar number (Hormozi).
|
|
Hook
formula:“[Specific dollar number] is what one customer churn cost us
in [previous disruption]. The reason was not the disruption. It was what we
did not say.”
|
Body (5 to 7
lines):
- Name a previous, dated disruption (Suez
2021, Red Sea 2024, your own 2022 fuel surcharge).
- The thing you did NOT communicate, and why
you thought silence was safe.
- The specific moment the customer found out
from a competitor or the news.
- The principle you now operate by.
|
|
Closing
line:“What are you not telling your customers this week because you
hope it goes away?”
|
|
Example opening:“$480k. That is
what one customer churn cost us in March 2022, three weeks into the
post-invasion fuel spike. The reason was not diesel. It was the email I did
not send.”
|
|
|
Template 3
The Three Scenarios Memo
Marketing function: demand generation through asymmetric value (give
the actual playbook, not a teaser). Mechanic: Hormozi’s “grand slam offer.”
Overdeliver on free content so the paid ask is trivially obvious.
|
|
Hook
formula:“Here is the actual three-scenario memo we sent customers
about [current event] yesterday. Steal it.”
|
|
Body:Post the
memo. Verbatim or near-verbatim. Three scenarios (base, stress, break), with
named triggers, ranges, and the customer-facing implication for each. No
commentary. Let the artefact speak.
|
|
Closing
line:“If you want the editable Notion version, comment ‘memo’ and I
will send it. If you want help writing yours, you know where to find me.”
|
|
Example opening:“Here is the
actual three-scenario memo we sent 47 customers about Hormuz yesterday. Steal
it.”
|
|
This template will outperform every “thought leadership” essay by a factor of
5 to 10 on saves, which is the single LinkedIn metric correlated with
inbound.
|
|
|
Template 4
The Lost Customer Story
Marketing function: brand-as-credible-operator (anti-guru). Mechanic:
specific named-number opening plus Stephen King’s “no adverbs” prose
discipline.
|
|
Hook
formula:“[Specific number]. That is what I lost on a [date]. Here is
what I would do differently if [current event] hits the same way.”
|
Body (8 to 10
lines):
- Line 1: number plus date.
- Lines 2 to 5: what happened, plain language,
no corporate softening, no passive voice.
- Lines 6 to 8: the lesson distilled into one
principle.
- Lines 9 to 10: the framework you now use, three bullets, no more.
|
|
Closing line:A
question, not a CTA. “What is the number you would not put on LinkedIn yet?”
|
|
Example opening:“€312,000. That
is what I lost on a Tuesday in November 2022. The customer did not leave
because we missed delivery. They left because I sent the apology email before
I sent the recovery plan.”
|
|
|
Template 5
The Competitor Pattern (no naming, just naming the pattern)
Marketing function: competitor displacement without legal exposure.
Mechanic: Dunford’s “pick your fight, name the alternative category.”
|
|
Hook
formula:“I am watching three different logistics providers respond
to [current event] and I can already tell you which one is going to lose
customers in Q3. Not because of the operations. Because of the comms.”
|
Body (6 to 8
lines):
- Name the pattern, not the company.
(“Provider A is sending a daily ‘situation update’ that contains no
decisions and no numbers. Provider B has gone silent. Provider C is
announcing surcharges before explaining the cost structure.”)
- Why each pattern fails, in customer
language, not industry language.
- The pattern that wins, in one sentence.
|
|
Closing
line:“If you are inside one of these companies and you cannot tell
which pattern you are running, that is your answer.”
|
|
Example opening:“I am watching
three different freight forwarders respond to the Hormuz situation and I can
already tell you which one is going to lose customers in Q3. Not because of
the operations. Because of the comms.”
|
|
|
One discipline that
applies to all five.Post once. Do not crosspost the same template
across your personal feed and the company page in the same week. It cheapens
both. The personal account is for templates 1, 2, 4, and 5. The company page
is for template 3.
|
|
|
|
|
04 · Operator’s Question of the Week
|
|
“How do I tell my sales team to talk about lead times when I genuinely do not know
what our lead times are right now?”
|
|
— VP Sales, mid-market industrial distributor, Bucharest
|
|
The honest
answer.Stop selling lead times. Start selling lead-time ranges with
explicit triggers.
|
|
The dishonest version of uncertainty communication is the one your reps are doing
right now: they pick the optimistic number, hope it holds, and apologise on Tuesday
of week five. Each apology costs you 8 to 12 percentage points of renewal
probability, depending on whose data you trust.
|
|
The honest version is structurally simple and almost nobody does it:
|
|
1.
|
Quote a base case with a confidence level. “Standard delivery is 4 weeks.
We hit that 78% of the time over the last 90 days.”
|
|
2.
|
Quote a stress case with named triggers. “Add 2 weeks if Brent crosses
$115. Add 3 weeks if Hormuz throughput drops below 14M bpd for ten
consecutive days.”
|
|
3.
|
Show the dashboard. Even a screenshot in a follow-up email beats a verbal
hedge.
|
|
|
You are not asking the customer to absorb your uncertainty. You are showing them
the system you use to absorb it on their behalf. That is what an enterprise buyer
is actually paying for and almost never receives.
|
|
The same logic applies upward, to your own board. The CFO who fires the COO during
a crisis is rarely the one who got bad numbers. It is the one who got numbers that
contradicted last month’s numbers without anyone naming the trigger that changed.
|
|
|
|
This Week
|
|
Top events to watch.
|
|
A short list. Not everything that happened — the five things that would change a
marketing or commercial decision for a B2B leader if they moved.
|
|
When
|
Event
|
Why it matters
|
Where
|
When
Tue 5 May
post-close
|
EventAMD Q1 earnings
|
Why it
mattersRead-through to AI infrastructure spend cycle. Soft guidance =
hyperscaler-adjacent pipelines re-forecasting.
|
WhereCNBC Markets
|
When
Wed 6 May
pre-mkt
|
EventApple Q2 earnings + AI roadmap commentary
|
Why it
mattersLargest single signal on consumer AI adoption pace this
quarter. Shapes every B2C-tilted positioning deck.
|
WhereReuters Tech
|
When
Wed 6 May
mid-day
|
EventOPEC+ communique follow-up after the 188k bpd
output increase
|
Why it
mattersWatch UAE response. If they walk further, oil $115 becomes the
base case, not the stress case.
|
WhereOPEC press room, Bloomberg Energy
|
When
Thu 7 May
all day
|
EventStrait of Hormuz vessel transit data + UAE–Iran
tit-for-tat
|
Why it
mattersSingle biggest input into your Q3 freight cost re-forecast.
|
WhereLloyd’s List, The Loadstar, Reuters Shipping
|
When
Fri 8 May
08:30 ET
|
EventUS Non-Farm Payrolls
|
Why it
mattersFirst read on whether the oil shock is bleeding into hiring.
Soft print = recession narrative becomes consensus.
|
WhereBLS Employment Situation, FT US Economy
|
|
|
Two background stories worth tracking even if they do not move this week: the
Denmark grid moratorium on data centres (read-through to all European AI
infrastructure timelines) and the Palantir HSBC downgrade (read-through to
AI-as-a-service multiples).
|
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
Authorities we read so you do not have to.
|
|
The newsroom and analyst reading list behind this issue. Bookmark whichever of
these you do not already follow.
|
|
Oil, energy, and
macro:CNBC Markets, Reuters Energy, Bloomberg Markets, Financial Times, US
Energy Information Administration, International Energy Agency.
|
|
Shipping, freight, supply
chain:Lloyd’s List, The Loadstar, FreightWaves, Journal of Commerce, IATA
fuel monitor.
|
|
Strategy and resilience
thinking:Yossi Sheffi at MIT Centre for Transportation & Logistics,
MIT Sloan Management Review, McKinsey Operations, BCG Operations.
|
|
AI, search, B2B buying
behaviour:a16z Enterprise, Stratechery, The Information.
|
|
|
|
Stay connected. Talk back.
|
|
We pick one operator’s question each week and answer it in section 4. The best ones
come from people three weeks into a disruption, not three minutes into one. Reply
to this email — we read every one.
|
|
If you want more between Tuesdays, the rest of our thinking lives across the Brave
New Media channels.
|
|
And honestly, we are curious. If you are inside a disruption right now, send us a
note. Tell us what you are seeing, what is breaking, what your team is arguing
about at 7am. We learn from these emails as much as you (hopefully) learn from
ours, and they shape what we write next. If something we said is useful, or wrong,
or could be sharper, we want to know. If we can help, we will say so plainly.
|
|
Anne Becheru
Founder, Brave New Media
|
|
|
We don’t do gurus. We do growth.
|
Brave New Media
